Inherently safer technology evaluation at concept and FEED stage
Technology selection workshops evaluate process route, reactor type, solvent system, and unit operations against inherent safety criteria. Conclusions shape selection of inherently safer technologies — continuous over batch, less hazardous solvents, lower-energy operations.
Build technology option inventory for the project / unit — reaction chemistry alternatives, reactor type (CSTR / PFR / batch / micro), separation technology (distillation / membrane / extraction), thermal management (jacket / coil / heat exchanger network).
Compare hazard profile per option — material toxicity / flammability / reactivity inventory, process temperature / pressure severity, fire / explosion potential, environmental impact; align with Dow F&EI / CEI screening and CCPS technology evaluation framework.
Apply ISD hierarchy to technology selection — minimise (smaller inventory, intensified process), substitute (safer chemistry, less hazardous solvent), moderate (lower temperature / pressure, dilution), simplify (fewer steps, fewer interfaces).
Quantify capex (equipment, instrumentation, civil), opex (energy, maintenance, materials), lifecycle cost (NPV over 20-year horizon); compare against hazard reduction benefit; align with corporate investment appraisal.
Assess technology maturity (TRL — Technology Readiness Level), commercial reference base, vendor capability, and project execution risk; align with stage-gate decision-making and corporate technology gatekeeping.
Document technology selection decision with hazard / cost / maturity trade-off; capture ISD credit for downstream LOPA / SIL / FERA / QRA; integrate with FEED gate review and SIM / FSA Stage 1 audit.
Complete Technology Selection for Inherent Hazard Reduction scope — every calculation, drawing, specification, and construction support activity.
Speak with our team to scope an engagement tailored to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.