Skip to content
HomeServicesInherent Safer Design

Inherent Safer Design

We work with your team to design hazards out of the process rather than relying on controls to contain them, applying the principles of substitute, minimise, moderate and simplify while your concept and FEED are still open, so that the safest and most economical option is locked in before the design freezes.

Strategic context

Why inherent safer design matters

Inherent Safer Design is the most economically effective risk reduction available, but only when it is applied before the design freezes. Our team works across the CCPS, IChemE and EPSC frameworks, running project level reviews at concept and FEED, targeted Substitute, Minimise, Moderate and Simplify workshops, Heikkilä ISI and INSET Toolkit quantitative scoring, technology selection for inherent hazard reduction, design integration with HAZOP and process intensification reviews that turn batch hazards into continuous flow safety. Eliminating a hazard at concept is 10 to 100 times cheaper than retrofitting a control layer later.

Inherent Safer Design
Engagement model

How we deliver

A phased, evidence led delivery model that runs from discovery through close out and is built around your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.

Concept Stage ISD Scoping
We set the review timing against your project stage gates across concept, FEED and post FID, identify the design freeze risks and capture the early opportunities that disappear once the P&IDs issue.
SMMS Workshop Facilitation
We work through Substitute, Minimise, Moderate and Simplify for each process node and chemical inventory with a multidisciplinary team drawn from process, operations, safety, reliability and R&D.
ISI, INSET and Dow F&EI Scoring
We score the hazard reduction of each design alternative quantitatively using the Heikkilä ISI, the INSET Toolkit and the Dow Fire and Explosion and Chemical Exposure Index.
Technology Selection and PI Review
We evaluate process intensification through microreactor, continuous flow and structured reactor routes as the default inherent safety option, with a capex, opex, schedule and ISD score trade off matrix.
ISD Design Basis Issue
We hand the inherent safer design basis document to the HAZOP, SIL and FEED gate review and capture the design credit in downstream LOPA to reduce the SIL allocation burden.
Outcomes & value

What this service delivers

  • Hazard elimination that delivers lifecycle cost savings of 10 to 100 times against control layer retrofit
  • Inventory reduction that collapses the consequence zone footprints
  • A reduced SIL allocation burden through inherent safer design driven hazard removal
  • Process intensification that opens up modular construction and a faster startup
  • An inherent safer design basis that withstands CCPS Vision 20/20 review
Why Arborion

Our differentiators

  • A concept and FEED stage engagement model rather than a late stage bolt on
  • Quantitative ISI and INSET scoring rather than opinion based ranking
  • Process intensification evaluation as a default inherent safety step
  • Integration with the HAZOP and SIL workflow that eliminates duplicate scrutiny

Standards we work to

CCPS ISD Guidelines 3rd Ed 2009IChemE Inherently Safer Design GuideCEFIC ISD GuidelinesAPI RP 750OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(d) PSISeveso III and COMAH Prevention PrincipleIEC 61511 SIL reduction through ISDDow Fire and Explosion Index baseline hazard indexMSIHC Rules 1989 IndiaFactories Act 1948 Section 41B IndiaCCPS ISD 3rd Ed 2019EPSC ISD GuideCCPS Inherently Safer Chemical Processes (2nd Ed., 2009)EPSC ISD Guidance

Industries we serve

  • Specialty and Fine Chemicals
  • Pharmaceuticals and API
  • Refineries and Petrochemicals
  • Hydrogen Production and Storage
  • Energetic Materials and Explosives
  • Polymer and Resin Manufacturing

Frequently asked questions

What is inherent safer design?

It is the practice of designing hazards out of a process rather than relying on added controls to contain them, applying the principles of substitute, minimise, moderate and simplify. We work with your team while the concept and FEED are still open so the safest and most economical option is locked in before the design freezes. Eliminating a hazard at concept is far cheaper than retrofitting a control layer later.

How do you assess inherent safety quantitatively?

We score the hazard reduction of each design alternative using the Heikkilä Inherent Safety Index and the INSET Toolkit alongside the Dow Fire and Explosion Index and the Chemical Exposure Index, so the ranking rests on numbers rather than opinion. We facilitate targeted substitute, minimise, moderate and simplify workshops for each process node and chemical inventory with a multidisciplinary team, then capture the credit in downstream LOPA.

When should it be applied?

It must be applied before the design freezes, which means at concept and FEED and before the P&IDs issue, because that is when the early opportunities exist and when they are cheapest to capture. Applied late it becomes a bolt on with little room to change the fundamentals. We set the review timing against your project stage gates so the window is not missed, and we also run redesign reviews after an incident.

Which frameworks and standards do you follow?

We work across the CCPS Inherently Safer Chemical Processes guidance, the IChemE Inherently Safer Design Guide and the EPSC ISD Guidance, using the Heikkilä Inherent Safety Index, the INSET Toolkit and the Dow indices for quantitative scoring. For India we align with the MSIHC Rules and Factories Act Section 41B.

What are the benefits and who is it for?

The benefits include hazard elimination that delivers large lifecycle cost savings against a control layer retrofit, inventory reduction that collapses the consequence zone footprints, a reduced SIL allocation burden and process intensification that opens up modular construction and faster startup. It applies to specialty and fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals and API, refineries and petrochemicals, hydrogen, energetic materials and polymer and resin manufacturing.

Get in touch

Talk to us about inherent safer design.

Connect with our team for a consultation scoped to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.