Technology-route evaluation — microreactor, flow chemistry, structured reactor — to engineer inherent safety into the design
Process intensification is the inherent-safer-design strategy that replaces conventional batch / stirred-tank chemistry with technology routes inherently smaller, more uniform, and less hazardous — microreactors, continuous-flow chemistry, structured (monolithic / packed-bed) reactors, reactive distillation, spinning-disc / spinning-mesh reactors, and distributed point-of-use generation of hazardous intermediates. The discipline operates at the CONCEPT / TECHNOLOGY SELECTION stage of a project — before pilot scale-up engineering (which is the operational discipline for moving lab chemistry to commercial scale once the technology is selected). Intensification reduces hazardous inventory by typical factors of 100–10000× compared to batch, with the corresponding reduction in consequence severity, emergency planning zone, SIL allocation burden, and insurance loading. The evaluation work compares conventional vs intensified routes against capex, opex, schedule, ISI/INSET score, and Heikkilä index, then defines a safety case for any novel technology where commercial reference base is thin.

Characterise the conventional batch / stirred-tank baseline — inventory per step, hazard index (Dow F&EI / CEI / Heikkilä ISI), consequence-zone distance, SIL allocation burden; document opportunity for inherent hazard reduction.
Screen intensification options — microreactor, continuous-flow, structured (monolithic / packed-bed) reactor, reactive distillation, spinning-disc, falling-film, membrane reactor; align with CCPS PI guidance and process-chemistry feasibility.
Verify reaction kinetics fit the intensified residence-time envelope; identify mass-transfer or heat-transfer limitations of conventional route that intensification resolves; quantify exotherm management gains.
Quantify inventory reduction (typical 100–10000× vs batch); recalculate consequence-zone distances, emergency-planning-zone footprint, and COMAH / Seveso threshold-quantity position; document SIL allocation reduction.
Compare intensified vs conventional route on capex (smaller equipment, modular construction), opex (utilities, footprint, maintenance), schedule (modular startup), and ISI score; build decision matrix for technology-route selection.
Author safety case for novel-technology route where commercial reference base is thin; integrate with ISD design basis; hand off selected technology to pilot-plant scale-up engineering (separate operational discipline) for lab-to-commercial execution.

Complete Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction scope — every calculation, drawing, specification, and construction support activity.
Speak with our team to scope an engagement tailored to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.