Inherent Safer Design

Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction

Technology-route evaluation — microreactor, flow chemistry, structured reactor — to engineer inherent safety into the design

Technical overview

Process Intensification for
Inherent Hazard Reduction

Process intensification is the inherent-safer-design strategy that replaces conventional batch / stirred-tank chemistry with technology routes inherently smaller, more uniform, and less hazardous — microreactors, continuous-flow chemistry, structured (monolithic / packed-bed) reactors, reactive distillation, spinning-disc / spinning-mesh reactors, and distributed point-of-use generation of hazardous intermediates. The discipline operates at the CONCEPT / TECHNOLOGY SELECTION stage of a project — before pilot scale-up engineering (which is the operational discipline for moving lab chemistry to commercial scale once the technology is selected). Intensification reduces hazardous inventory by typical factors of 100–10000× compared to batch, with the corresponding reduction in consequence severity, emergency planning zone, SIL allocation burden, and insurance loading. The evaluation work compares conventional vs intensified routes against capex, opex, schedule, ISI/INSET score, and Heikkilä index, then defines a safety case for any novel technology where commercial reference base is thin.

Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction — Overview
Engineering process

Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction workflow

Conventional Baseline & Hazard Profile

Characterise the conventional batch / stirred-tank baseline — inventory per step, hazard index (Dow F&EI / CEI / Heikkilä ISI), consequence-zone distance, SIL allocation burden; document opportunity for inherent hazard reduction.

Intensification Technology Screening

Screen intensification options — microreactor, continuous-flow, structured (monolithic / packed-bed) reactor, reactive distillation, spinning-disc, falling-film, membrane reactor; align with CCPS PI guidance and process-chemistry feasibility.

Kinetics & Residence-Time Compatibility

Verify reaction kinetics fit the intensified residence-time envelope; identify mass-transfer or heat-transfer limitations of conventional route that intensification resolves; quantify exotherm management gains.

Inventory & Consequence-Zone Quantification

Quantify inventory reduction (typical 100–10000× vs batch); recalculate consequence-zone distances, emergency-planning-zone footprint, and COMAH / Seveso threshold-quantity position; document SIL allocation reduction.

Capex / Opex / Schedule Trade-Off

Compare intensified vs conventional route on capex (smaller equipment, modular construction), opex (utilities, footprint, maintenance), schedule (modular startup), and ISI score; build decision matrix for technology-route selection.

Safety Case & Technology Hand-Off

Author safety case for novel-technology route where commercial reference base is thin; integrate with ISD design basis; hand off selected technology to pilot-plant scale-up engineering (separate operational discipline) for lab-to-commercial execution.

Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction — Scope
Scope of work

Every deliverable — from basis to handover

Complete Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction scope — every calculation, drawing, specification, and construction support activity.

Technology-route screening — batch vs continuous, conventional vs intensified, conventional vs novel
Microreactor and flow chemistry feasibility — kinetics, residence time, exotherm management
Structured reactor evaluation — monolithic, packed-bed, falling-film, membrane reactor
Reactive distillation, spinning-disc, and other PI technology screening
Inventory reduction quantification — typical 100–10000× vs batch, with consequence-zone collapse
Heikkilä ISI / INSET Toolkit comparison across intensified vs conventional alternatives
Capex / opex / schedule trade-off — modular construction, lower utilities, faster startup
Safety case for novel technology where commercial reference base is thin
SIL allocation reduction demonstrated through inventory and consequence reduction
Hand-off to pilot-plant scale-up engineering (separate operational discipline) once technology is selected
Engineering outcomes

Outcomes of Process Intensification for Inherent Hazard Reduction

Scale-Up Hazard Control Assurance
  • Dramatically reduces inventory at source
  • Improves heat and mass transfer
  • Reduces residence time and runaway potential
  • Strengthens inherent safety
CCPS / DIERS / SCALE Guidelines Defence
  • Adheres to CCPS ISD and scale-up guidance
  • Supports COMAH/SEVESO inventory reduction
  • Documents safe scale-up basis
  • Withstands regulator novel-tech review
Process Intensification Design Quality
  • Smaller footprint and cleaner operation
  • Faster product changeover
  • Improved quality control
  • Supports modular construction
Pilot-to-Production Scale-Up Efficiency
  • Lower capex through smaller equipment
  • Reduced opex through energy efficiency
  • Faster time-to-market through modularity
  • Supports lower insurance loadings
Get Started

Ready to start your project?

Speak with our team to scope an engagement tailored to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.