Skip to content
HomeServicesChemical Safety Evaluation & Testing

Chemical Safety Evaluation & Testing

We generate the laboratory data your chemistry needs and we turn it into engineering decisions you can act on, covering thermal stability, calorimetry, dust explosibility, reactivity and flammability so that the real behaviour of your materials is understood before it ever reaches the plant.

Strategic context

Why chemical safety evaluation & testing matters

Chemical Safety Evaluation translates laboratory measurement into engineering decision. Thermal stability, calorimetric runaway profiles, dust explosibility across Kst, Pmax, MIE, MIT and LOC, flammability limits, reactivity screening and vent sizing data form the foundation under every credible hazard study, relief design and inherent safer design review. Our work brings together accredited testing through DSC, ARC, VSP2, the 20 L sphere and the ASTM and CEFIC protocols with engineering interpretation that converts the data into safe operating windows, MTSR limits and DIERS sized vent areas you can defend at FSA Stage 2 or after an incident.

Chemical Safety Evaluation & Testing
Engagement model

How we deliver

A phased, evidence led delivery model that runs from discovery through close out and is built around your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.

Literature Screen and Test Plan
We work through the CHETAH, Bretherick and Yoshida indices and the NOAA Reactivity worksheet, then design a tiered test programme matched to the chemistry hazard profile and your downstream engineering needs.
Calorimetric and Explosibility Testing
We run DSC, ARC, VSP2 and Phi Tec, the 20 L sphere and MIE, MIT and LOC per ASTM and CEFIC protocols at accredited ISO IEC 17025 laboratories.
Engineering Interpretation
We perform Stoessel classification, calculate MTSR, TMR24 and SADT, define the safe operating window and prepare the DIERS vent sizing inputs.
Design Recommendations
We issue vent sizing, the control philosophy, the inerting strategy, the kill system specification and the inputs that feed HAZOP and SIL allocation.
Dossier Issue at PSI Grade
We compile an OSHA PSM Process Safety Information dossier with raw data, classification and design basis that holds up under FSA Stage 2 and regulator examination.
Outcomes & value

What this service delivers

  • A defensible thermal stability and runaway envelope mapped to the Stoessel class
  • DIERS sized emergency vents with a clear engineering evidence trail
  • Dust Hazard Analysis input that meets the NFPA 660 2024 requirements
  • Hazardous area classification grounded in measured flammability data
  • A scale up safety basis that holds up under FDA and EMA inspection
Why Arborion

Our differentiators

  • Accredited laboratory partnerships across an ISO IEC 17025 testing chain
  • Engineering interpretation included rather than test reports alone
  • Integration with HAZOP, LOPA and vent sizing in one workflow
  • Multi jurisdiction labelling across GHS, India GSR 1132 and REACH

Standards we work to

ASTM E537 and E2069 (DSC)ASTM E1981 and E2070 (ARC)UN MTC Series H (SADT)DIN 51007 and DIN 51005CCPS Reactive Chemicals GuidelinesDIERS Project ManualISO 11357 (DSC)SADT per UN Recommendations on TransportUN TDG Manual of Tests and CriteriaGHS Rev. 10 (UN)MSIHC Schedule 1 (India)CHETAH ProgrammeASTM E1226, E1515, and E2019 (US dust)EN 14034 1, 2, 3, and 4 (EU dust)

Industries we serve

  • Specialty and Fine Chemicals
  • Pharmaceuticals and API
  • Polymers and Resins
  • Food, Feed and Powder Handling
  • Energetic Materials and Explosives
  • Battery and Energy Storage

Frequently asked questions

What is chemical safety evaluation and testing?

It is the work that translates laboratory measurement into engineering decisions you can act on. We generate data on thermal stability, calorimetric runaway profiles, dust explosibility, flammability limits, reactivity and vent sizing, then interpret it into safe operating windows, MTSR limits and DIERS sized vent areas. The aim is that the real behaviour of your materials is understood before it ever reaches the plant.

What testing methods and standards underpin the work?

We use Differential Scanning Calorimetry and adiabatic calorimetry through ARC, VSP2 and Phi Tec, the 20 L sphere for dust and the ASTM and CEFIC protocols, working to standards including ASTM E537, E1226, E1981, E2079, D93 and E659, the AIChE DIERS vent sizing methodology, NFPA 660 for dust hazard analysis and the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. Testing runs through accredited ISO IEC 17025 laboratory partners.

Why is this testing needed before scale up?

Runaway reactions, dust explosions and thermal instability are only credible once the measured behaviour of your chemistry is known, and literature values rarely capture your exact formulation or process conditions. Generating the data early gives you a defensible thermal stability and runaway envelope, correctly sized emergency vents and a scale up safety basis that holds up under FDA and EMA inspection, rather than discovering the hazard on the plant.

What deliverables come out of an evaluation?

You receive raw calorimetric and explosibility data, a Stoessel classification of the reaction hazard, calculated MTSR, TMR24 and SADT values, a defined safe operating window, DIERS vent sizing inputs and a control and inerting philosophy. We compile it into a Process Safety Information dossier that feeds directly into your HAZOP, LOPA and inherent safer design reviews.

Which sectors does this serve?

We serve specialty and fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals and API, polymers and resins, food, feed and powder handling, energetic materials and explosives, and battery and energy storage. Any process with reactive chemistry, combustible dust or thermally sensitive materials benefits from measured data rather than assumption.

Get in touch

Talk to us about chemical safety evaluation & testing.

Connect with our team for a consultation scoped to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.