SBTi-validated decarbonisation pathways engineered against MACC, TRL, and capital reality
Most corporate net-zero pledges made between 2020 and 2023 are now under scrutiny — by SBTi (which removed 200+ companies from its Net-Zero Standard in 2024 for missed validation deadlines), by NGOs (NewClimate Institute, CarbonMarketWatch), and by litigators (Holcim, KLM, Shell rulings). A credible net-zero roadmap now requires SBTi 1.5°C-aligned near-term targets (typically 2030, 42% Scope 1+2 reduction from a 2020 base), long-term targets (typically 2050, 90% absolute reduction), and an interim BVCM (Beyond Value Chain Mitigation) and residual-removals strategy. The engineering core is MACC modelling against TRL-adjusted abatement options — energy efficiency (negative cost), electrification and process intensification (CCUS for high-temperature heat, hydrogen for chemicals reduction), and renewable energy procurement (additionality-tested PPAs, not unbundled RECs). The hardest scenarios — cement, steel, hard-to-abate chemicals, aviation — require explicit dependence on supplier transitions, technology curves, and policy assumptions made transparent.

A practical, phased delivery approach — from gap assessment through operational embedding — built around your regulatory context.
Establish baseline GHG inventory per GHG Protocol / ISO 14064-1 (typically 2018-2020 base year); set Science-Based Target per SBTi Net-Zero Standard — near-term (2030, 1.5°C aligned 4.2% pa reduction), long-term (2050, 90% reduction).
Identify decarbonisation levers per IEA Net Zero by 2050 / IPCC AR6 — energy efficiency (industrial, building, transport), electrification (heat pumps, EVs), low-carbon fuels (H₂, biofuels, biogas), renewable electricity (PPA, on-site), CCUS, behavioural change.
Build MACC per McKinsey / EPA / Vivid Economics — abatement potential (tCO₂e/year) vs marginal cost ($/tCO₂e) for each lever; identify low / no-cost levers and high-cost-but-essential levers; align with corporate capital allocation.
Sequence decarbonisation projects across capital plan — near-term (energy efficiency, fuel switching), medium-term (electrification, renewable PPA), long-term (CCUS, hydrogen, novel technology); align with corporate stage-gate and TCFD transition risk.
Design residual emission strategy per SBTi Net-Zero — minimise (typically <10% by 2050), then neutralise via carbon removal (afforestation, BECCS, DAC, biochar, mineralisation); align with ICVCM Core Carbon Principles and high-integrity removals.
Design governance — board oversight, executive accountability, scope-level KPIs, internal carbon pricing; integrate with TCFD / IFRS S2 climate disclosure, EU CSRD ESRS E1, CDP Climate Change; align with annual SBTi progress reporting.

Speak with our team to scope an engagement tailored to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.