Skip to content
Emergency Response & Crisis Management

Emergency Response and Disaster Management Planning

We build an ICS and NIMS aligned emergency response plan for major accident response, from QRA derived scenarios through to mutual aid integration

What this study delivers

Emergency Response and Disaster
Management Planning

Emergency response planning has matured well beyond the compliance driven plan that sits on a shelf, and our team treats it as a living discipline that brings together the Incident Command System under ICS and NIMS, the HSE and COMAH on site and off site emergency plan obligations, ISO 22320 on emergency management and the hard lessons of recent major events including Caribbean Petroleum in 2009, West Fertilizer in 2013, the Tianjin Port disaster in 2015 that took 165 lives, the Beirut ammonium nitrate explosion in 2020 that took 218, and Atlas Tianjin in 2024. We make every plan credible by deriving its scenarios from your QRA and FERA outputs, we define a clear ICS hierarchy with an Incident Commander and dedicated Operations, Planning, Logistics and Finance and Administration sections, we set notification thresholds and external agency interfaces and we build mutual aid arrangements on realistic time to arrival. Most consequentially, we exercise the plan through tabletop, functional and full scale drills with independent observers and a disciplined after action review. The hardest move is shifting your organisation from compliance driven annual drills into a learning culture where emergency response gaps surface continuously through HAZOP recommendations, management of change reviews and near miss investigation, and that is the shift we help you make.

Emergency Response and Disaster Management Planning Overview
Study execution

How the study is executed

A structured, facilitated process that runs from scope definition through close out and produces defensible, actionable outputs.

Hazard Scenario Review

We review your QRA, HAZOP and consequence modelling to identify the credible major accident scenarios the plan must address.

ERP Framework Design

We define the emergency response organisation, the command structure, the roles and responsibilities and the activation criteria.

Procedure Development

We author response procedures for each major scenario covering fire, toxic release, explosion, spill and medical emergency.

Resource and Equipment Audit

We verify your first response equipment, communications, PPE and medical resources against what the plan requires.

Drill Design and Execution

We design tabletop and live drill scenarios and facilitate them with an independent observer team.

After Action Review

We debrief participants, document findings and update the plan with corrective actions and improvement items.

Emergency Response and Disaster Management Planning Scope
Study scope

What the study covers in full

Credible major accident scenarios that we derive from your QRA, FERA, HAZOP and CCPS style RBPS findings
An ICS and NIMS aligned emergency response organisation with section chiefs and a workable span of control
A notification matrix covering internal escalation, external agencies, the regulator, media and the community
Emergency Command Centre design that stays resilient through primary, alternate and mobile locations
Hazard specific response procedures for fire, explosion, toxic release, spill, medical, security and cyber events
A mutual aid agreement framework with realistic time to arrival and capability mapping
An on site and off site plan interface that meets COMAH Reg.12 and Reg.13 or EPA RMP Subpart F
Tabletop, functional and full scale drill design with independent observer evaluation
A disciplined after action review with corrective action tracking
Business Continuity Plan integration to ISO 22301 so your site recovers after an event
Why it matters

Outcomes of Emergency Response and Disaster Management Planning

Major Accident Response Capability
  • Your trained and rehearsed people respond effectively to West Fertilizer and Tianjin class events
  • Documented procedures remove improvised decisions when people are under crisis stress
  • A clear ICS command structure prevents confusion during a multi agency response
  • Mutual aid arrangements with verified time to arrival mean outside support actually reaches your site
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.38 and EPA RMP Defence
  • Your plan stands up to OSHA 29 CFR 1910.38 and 1910.120(q) HAZWOPER review
  • It withstands COMAH Reg.12 and Reg.13 competent authority examination
  • It aligns with the EPA RMP Subpart F emergency response obligation
  • It satisfies the NFPA 1600 emergency management programme standard
ICS and NIMS Command and Control Quality
  • Drills surface gaps in resources, communications and procedural detail
  • We verify your Emergency Command Centre works through a realistic scenario exercise
  • Mutual aid integration is tested before a real event ever arrives
  • Business continuity integration shortens recovery and business interruption after an event
Emergency Response Readiness Efficiency
  • A well rehearsed response limits asset damage and business interruption and saves millions
  • You reduce liability exposure from inadequate emergency preparedness
  • You trim insurance premium loadings by demonstrating a mature response plan
  • You avoid regulator enforcement for inadequate emergency procedures
Standards & references

Codes & standards we work to

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.38 and 1910.120(q) HAZWOPEREPA 40 CFR 68 Subpart F RMP emergency responseNFPA 1600 Standard on Continuity, Emergency and Crisis Management 2024NFPA 1561 Emergency Services Incident ManagementISO 22320 2018FEMA NIMS and ICSCOMAH Regulations 2015 Reg.12 on site and Reg.13 off siteAPI RP 754 PSE indicators with emergency response signalCCPS Guidelines for Crisis ManagementDisaster Management Act 2005 IndiaNDMA Guidelines IndiaMSIHC Rules 13 and 14 On Site and Off Site Emergency Plan IndiaNDMA Off Site Emergency Plan GuidelinesNFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible LiquidsAPI 2510 LPG
When to engage

Triggers that signal the need

Starting up a new facility with a major accident inventoryResetting the plan and capturing learning after an incidentA COMAH, OSHA or EPA RMP regulatory requestPeriodic plan revalidation that is usually annualA major process change that alters credible scenariosDay one emergency response integration after an acquisitionRenewing a mutual aid agreementRevising the community or off site plan
Industries served

Where Emergency Response and Disaster Management Planning applies

Oil and Gas Terminals

We serve onshore and offshore terminals storing LNG, LPG, crude oil and hydrocarbons.

TerminalLNGLPG
Refineries

We support large refinery operations that carry many major accident scenarios and mutual aid obligations.

RefineryMajor Hazard
Chemical Plants

We plan response for chemical sites handling toxic, flammable and reactive materials.

ChemicalToxic
Manufacturing and Warehousing

We work with sites that store hazardous goods, run loading and unloading and sit near the public.

WarehousingCOMAH
Power Generation

We support power stations with ammonia, hydrogen and fuel oil emergency response obligations.

PowerAmmonia
LNG Facilities

We plan for LNG storage and regasification sites that carry NFPA 59A response requirements.

LNGNFPA 59A
What we deliver

Tangible deliverables

  • A site emergency plan aligned to ICS, NIMS and COMAH
  • Hazard specific response procedures linked to your QRA and FERA scenarios
  • An ICS organisation chart with section roles and a notification matrix
  • An Emergency Command Centre design specification covering primary, alternate and mobile
  • A mutual aid agreement framework with capability mapping
  • A tabletop, functional and full scale drill scenario library
  • An after action review framework with templates
  • A corrective action tracking register
  • A business continuity integration interface
  • An annual plan revalidation schedule
Get Started

Ready to start your project?

Speak with our team to scope an engagement tailored to your facility, regulatory context, and lifecycle stage.