HomeServicesSustainability & ESGClimate Risk & TCFD / ISSB S2-Aligned DisclosureResilience of Strategy Under Different Climate Scenarios (incl. 2°C / 1.5°C)
Climate Risk & TCFD / ISSB S2-Aligned DisclosurePillar 2 — Strategy

Resilience of Strategy Under Different Climate Scenarios (incl. 2°C / 1.5°C)

Describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy under different climate scenarios, including 1.5°C or 2°C scenarios

Strategic context

What this element is — and why it matters

TCFD Strategy Disclosure (c) requires organisations to describe the resilience of strategy under different climate scenarios — minimum 2°C scenarios; ideally 1.5°C aligned with SBTi and Paris Agreement; using NGFS, IEA Net-Zero, IPCC scenarios. This is the most analytically demanding TCFD disclosure.

Resilience of Strategy Under Different Climate Scenarios (incl. 2°C / 1.5°C)

Individual significance for organisations

S-c is the disclosure that separates serious climate-disclosure organisations from box-tick reporters. Substantive scenario analysis with specific business implications signals to investors that climate is genuinely integrated into strategy.

Contribution to Climate Risk & TCFD / ISSB S2-Aligned Disclosure

S-c is the apex of the Strategy pillar. It tests whether the organisation's strategy holds under stress scenarios — informing strategic adjustments, capital re-allocation, and risk-management priorities.

Key requirements

What compliant execution looks like

2°C scenario analysis (TCFD minimum)
1.5°C aligned scenario (SBTi / Paris Agreement)
Multiple scenarios — NGFS / IEA NZE / IPCC AR6
Resilience assessment with business implications
Implementation methodology

How we implement this element

A focused 6-step methodology calibrated to deliver resilience of strategy under different climate scenarios (incl. 2°c / 1.5°c) as a working capability — not a documented compliance artefact.

Scenario Selection

Select scenarios per TCFD guidance — minimum 2°C; recommend 1.5°C + Hot House (4°C+) for sensitivity; choose NGFS / IEA / IPCC source.

Time Horizons + Assumptions

Calibrate to corporate strategic planning (typical 5 / 10 / 20 yr); document assumptions on technology, policy, market.

Quantitative Modelling

Model financial / operational impact under each scenario — revenue, cost, capex, asset value, supply chain; integrate with financial planning tools.

Resilience Assessment

Per scenario, assess strategy resilience; identify breakpoints; document hedging / adaptation strategies.

Strategic Implications

Translate scenario findings to strategic adjustments — portfolio choices, R&D priorities, M&A criteria, capital re-allocation.

Disclosure Authoring

Author S-c per TCFD with scenario narrative + quantitative outputs + strategic implications; align with IFRS S2.

Implementation flow

Element-implementation flow chart

Decision-gated workflow showing the actual sequence of activities — from initiation through steady-state operation — with key decision points highlighted.

Start
S-a + S-b inputs received
Scenario Selection
2°C minimum + 1.5°C + Hot House
Source Database
NGFS / IEA NZE / IPCC AR6
Time Horizons
5 / 10 / 20 yr per scenario
Quantitative Modelling
Revenue + cost + capex + asset value
Decision
Strategy Resilient Under All?
Decision gate
Hedging / Adaptation
Strategic adjustments documented
Disclosure S-c Authored
Per TCFD + IFRS S2
Deliverables

What we produce

  • Scenario analysis pack with quantitative outputs
  • Strategy resilience assessment per scenario
  • Disclosure S-c content per TCFD
Common pitfalls

Where execution fails

  • Qualitative scenario discussion without quantitative modelling
  • Single scenario (typically 2°C) — no sensitivity range
  • Findings not translated to strategic decisions
Related elements

Explore related elements in this framework

All elements in this framework

Climate Risk & TCFD / ISSB S2-Aligned Disclosure — full element index

Implement this element

Talk to us about implementing Resilience of Strategy Under Different Climate Scenarios (incl. 2°C / 1.5°C)

We can scope this element implementation against your facility, regulatory context, and existing management-system maturity — and integrate it with the other Climate Risk & TCFD / ISSB S2-Aligned Disclosure elements you already operate.