Skip to content
OSHA Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119)

Contractors

Selection based on safety performance, pre job orientation, injury tracking, and periodic evaluation of contractors

Strategic context

What this element is and why it matters

OSHA PSM at 1910.119(h) covers maintenance, repair, turnaround, major renovation, and specialty work performed by contractors on or near covered processes. The element splits responsibility into two parts. Paragraph (h)(2) sets the employer obligations, which include selecting contractors on the basis of safety performance, communicating hazard information, providing a pre job orientation, tracking injuries, and evaluating performance periodically. Paragraph (h)(3) sets the contractor obligations, which include training employees, supervisor responsibility, hazard reporting, and adherence to the safety rules. Our team builds a programme that holds both sides to the same standard.

Contractors

Individual significance for organisations

Without a structured programme, contractor incident rates have historically run two to five times the rate of direct employees. The modern process industry depends on contractors for between thirty and sixty per cent of turnaround work hours. Facilities that manage contractors as peers see their contractor incident rates fall in line with direct employee rates, while facilities that treat contractors as separate carry a disproportionate share of incident exposure, and we help your team close that gap.

Contribution to OSHA Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119)

Paragraph (h) extends the management system out to the workforce that is not directly employed yet performs the highest risk activities, including turnarounds, modifications, and specialty maintenance. It integrates with employee participation in (c) through joint health and safety committees, with training in (g) through contractor competency, with hot work in (k) through permit to work discipline, and with the pre startup safety review in (i) through contractor work close out. This element prevents a coverage gap during exactly the work where prevention matters most.

Key requirements

What compliant execution looks like

Contractor selection based on safety performance under (h)(2)(i)
Communication of hazard information under (h)(2)(ii)
A pre job site orientation under (h)(2)(iii)
Tracking of injuries and illness under (h)(2)(iv)
Periodic evaluation under (h)(2)(v)
Contractor employer obligations under (h)(3)
Implementation methodology

How we implement this element

A focused six step methodology calibrated to deliver contractors as a working capability rather than a documented compliance artefact.

Selection Criteria

To meet (h)(2)(i) we build pre qualification criteria around recordable and lost time injury frequency thresholds, OSHA citation history, and insurance certificates, aligned with ISNetworld, Avetta, and OISD 149.

Hazard Information and Orientation

To meet (h)(2)(ii) and (iii) we run a pre mobilisation orientation covering the site hazards, evacuation, the permit to work system, and emergency response.

Injury and Illness Tracking

To meet (h)(2)(iv) we specify the reporting requirements across recordable injuries, lost time injuries, and near misses with monthly aggregation.

Periodic Evaluation

To meet (h)(2)(v) we evaluate contractor safety performance during and after the engagement and document it to inform future selection decisions.

Active Supervision

We match supervision intensity to the tier of work, with continuous supervision for high hazard tier one, intermittent for tier two, and periodic for tier three.

Close Out and Re Engagement

We close each contract with an HSE scorecard and lessons learned and tie the re engagement decision into your procurement database.

Implementation flow

Element implementation flow chart

A decision gated workflow that shows the actual sequence of activities from initiation through steady state operation, with key decision points highlighted.

Start
Procurement raises a contractor engagement requirement
Pre Qualification (h)(2)(i)
Injury frequency, OSHA history, insurance, and training records
Decision
Threshold Met?
Decision gate
Hazard Information (h)(2)(ii)
Process hazards, evacuation, and the permit to work system
Pre Job Orientation (h)(2)(iii)
Site induction, job safety analysis review, and protective equipment issued
Active Work Supervision
Intensity matched to the tier under (h)(2)(v)
Injury Tracking (h)(2)(iv)
Recordable and lost time injuries and near misses
Decision
Performance Issue?
Decision gate
Corrective Action
Stop work, root cause analysis, retraining, and restart
Close Out Scorecard
Final HSE performance, lessons learned, and the re engagement decision
Deliverables

What we produce

  • A contractor pre qualification framework meeting (h)(2)(i)
  • A pre mobilisation orientation package
  • An injury and illness tracking system meeting (h)(2)(iv)
  • A periodic evaluation scorecard
  • A supervision plan matched to the tier of work
  • A close out review protocol
Common pitfalls

Where execution fails

  • Pre qualification done once and never refreshed
  • Orientation treated as a box to tick without verifying comprehension
  • Periodic evaluation skipped so the same poor contractors are re engaged
  • Tier classification ignored under turnaround time pressure
Standards & references

Codes this element is built on

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(h) (Contractors, US)OISD STD 149 (Contractor Safety, India)Factories Act 1948 Section 41B (India Contractor Provisions)ISNetworld and Avetta (Pre Qualification Platforms)ISO 45001 Clause 8.1.4 (Outsourcing)MSIHC Rules 1989 Rule 4 (India)
Implement this element

Talk to us about implementing Contractors

We can scope this element implementation against your facility, regulatory context, and existing management system maturity, then integrate it with the other OSHA Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119) elements you already operate.